IsoHunt founder Gary Fung has published a short essay on copyright , in which he points out some major issues of the copyright infringement debate; some of the links in the essay are very recommendable as well, for instance the article who owns ideas?.

A few quotations (I did not insert original links, please check out the article on IsoHunt for those):

When sharing equals copying on the internet and the direct cost of that sharing is effectively $0 (it doesn’t cost you anything to share videos on Youtube or BitTorrent), it makes copyright infringement so easy that even Dan Glickman can do it. So easy that a mom like Stephanie Lenz can do it when she posted a video of her 13-month-old son dancing to Prince’s music.

(…)

Remixing and sharing is good for culture, suing consumers and technologists who enable sharing is destructive for everyone. The internet is a more efficient information machine than the printing press or VCR ever was, and also a whole different animal. It’s time the content industries learn to put it to better use as well, by discarding past notions of how business is done based on an economy of scarcity. In Star Trek, currency becomes irrelevant with virtually unlimited “copying” of physical objects with the Replicator. The internet is the Replicator of information. When a 13-month-old dances to Prince’s music, copyright infringement is nowhere near his consciousness. It’s an endorsement that he likes it, pure and simple.

(…)

I’ve said a number of times that I’m not against copyright, but copyright does need significant reform in the internet age. If all this rampant copying on BitTorrent and the internet has not made a dent in Hollywood’s record earnings, why can’t we all just get along without rabid lawsuits? Why can’t they see that sharing and remixing is a human urge for culture, and when we share and remixes art, it’s not a liability but an endorsement for the artist or author or producer?

When the majority of society has no ethical conviction of wrongdoing when they violate copyright law, it’s not society that’s wrong, it’s the law. Because no one can really own ideas. Newton once said, “If I have seen further it is only by standing on the shoulders of Giants.” It’s how the arts and sciences progresses. We share, we inspire and we remix.

And since this post is all about sharing: feel free to share this article, Gary posted it under the CC BY-SA license.

If (by Rudyard Kipling)

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or being hated, don’t give way to hating,
And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise:

If you can dream — and not make dreams your master;
If you can think — and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster
And treat those two imposters just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken,
And stoop and build ‘em up with worn-out tools;

If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: “Hold on!”

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings — nor lose the common touch,
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run –
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And — which is more — you’ll be a Man, my son!

— Thanks to Alice

“God does not play dice with the universe; He plays an ineffable game of His own devising, which might be compared, from the perspective of any of the other players (i.e. everybody), to being involved in an obscure and complex version of poker in a pitch-black room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a Dealer who won’t tell you the rules, and who always smiles.”

— Neil Gaiman, Good Omens

– via codec

Tough choice …

— Source (thanks to Alice)

Update, 19.10.2008:
Colin Powell – the former Republican secretary of state – said in “Meet the Press” on NBC yesterday, that he’s going to vote for Obama and not for McCain.

We can’t stop here – this is bat country!

— Thanks to Lucie, and greetings to New Zealand!

As far as I’m concerned:

• Obama vs. McCain: 4:6 and …
• Biden vs. Palin: 7:3 …

… with 10 points to distribute per debate.

I was surprised how calm and clear McCain talked, and how messy Obama’s talk got from time to time (I had contrary expectations). Then again, Biden was clearly ahead of Palin; she had learned most of her statements by heart (as did Biden, I reckon, but you didn’t see it that well), she dodged critital questions many times, and simply wasn’t as genuine and frank as Biden.

I also have to add that my opinion is not shared by the media; all reports I’ve read (around 5 for each debate) state 5:5 for both debates.

Hm … I guess we *should* be afraid of the Finns, after all.

— source: wikipedia.org