RSS
  • Home Page Home
  • Camera Photography
  • about
  • about me
  • links
  • list: books

we give up

link of the day, politics, science, skepticism, worth living for Add comments

The Scientific American, April 2005, about giving up on being persuaded by “mere evidence”.

In retrospect, this magazine’s coverage of so-called evolution has been hideously one-sided. For decades, we published articles in every issue that endorsed the ideas of Charles Darwin and his cronies. True, the theory of common descent through natural selection has been called the unifying concept for all of biology and one of the greatest scientific ideas of all time, but that was no excuse to be fanatics about it. Where were the answering articles presenting the powerful case for scientific creationism? Why were we so unwilling to suggest that dinosaurs lived 6,000 years ago or that a cataclysmic flood carved the Grand Canyon? Blame the scientists. They dazzled us with their fancy fossils, their radiocarbon dating and their tens of thousands of peer-reviewed journal articles. As editors, we had no business being persuaded by mountains of evidence.

A hilarious article worth reading.

(– via brainchallenged spacegirl)


October 31st, 2012  

Leave a Reply

  • photography exhibition

    Exhibition ended: details
  • Recent Posts

    • hillary clinton’s 3 minute statement on reproductive health
    • brave new world: why privacy matters
    • US wealth distribution
    • kafka
    • putin on the syria conflict
  • Recent Comments

    • amenity on the lady A
    • amenity on the lady A
    • E. on severins gang in die finsternis
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • buy posters and art prints

  • buy posters and art prints

Copyright © 2021 - Eiko Fried. Credits to ChanDara for the awesome WordPress template.
XHTML CSS Log in
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.