RSS
  • Home Page Home
  • Camera Photography
  • about
  • about me
  • links
  • list: books

the drugs don’t work …

dystopia, politics, science, skepticism Add comments

The Guardian published an edited extract from “Bad Pharma”, by Ben Goldacre, published next week.

I don’t know what to say. These are facts, and I read a lot of the papers he talks about. We really need to do something about this. It’s one of the greatest and most dangerous crimes of our times.

Just one example:

“When GlaxoSmithKline applied for a marketing authorisation in children for paroxetine, an extraordinary situation came to light, triggering the longest investigation in the history of UK drugs regulation. Between 1994 and 2002, GSK conducted nine trials of paroxetine in children. The first two failed to show any benefit, but the company made no attempt to inform anyone of this by changing the “drug label” that is sent to all doctors and patients. In fact, after these trials were completed, an internal company management document stated: “It would be commercially unacceptable to include a statement that efficacy had not been demonstrated, as this would undermine the profile of paroxetine.” In the year after this secret internal memo, 32,000 prescriptions were issued to children for paroxetine in the UK alone: so, while the company knew the drug didn’t work in children, it was in no hurry to tell doctors that, despite knowing that large numbers of children were taking it. More trials were conducted over the coming years – nine in total – and none showed that the drug was effective at treating depression in children.

It gets much worse than that. These children weren’t simply receiving a drug that the company knew to be ineffective for them; they were also being exposed to side-effects. This should be self-evident, since any effective treatment will have some side-effects, and doctors factor this in, alongside the benefits (which in this case were nonexistent). But nobody knew how bad these side-effects were, because the company didn’t tell doctors, or patients, or even the regulator about the worrying safety data from its trials. This was because of a loophole: you have to tell the regulator only about side-effects reported in studies looking at the specific uses for which the drug has a marketing authorisation. Because the use of paroxetine in children was “off-label”, GSK had no legal obligation to tell anyone about what it had found.”

Please read the full article, and consider looking into the book.

– Source: guardian.co.uk


September 23rd, 2012  

Leave a Reply

  • photography exhibition

    Exhibition ended: details
  • Recent Posts

    • hillary clinton’s 3 minute statement on reproductive health
    • brave new world: why privacy matters
    • US wealth distribution
    • kafka
    • putin on the syria conflict
  • Recent Comments

    • amenity on the lady A
    • amenity on the lady A
    • E. on severins gang in die finsternis
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • buy posters and art prints

  • buy posters and art prints

Copyright © 2022 - Eiko Fried. Credits to ChanDara for the awesome WordPress template.
XHTML CSS Log in
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.