President Obama promised to close the prison Guantanamo within 6 months of his presidency. According to tagesschau.de it is unlikely that the torture prison will be closed within the next four years.
(Update: NY Times article )
After the thwarted terrorist attacks last Christmas, only 40% of the US population is in favour of shutting Guantanamo down.
What do the other 60% stand for?
For keeping people in a prison who have not had a trial, in up to 8 years. Who were never properly accused of anything, in a court. Who are not allowed to see lawyers, who cannot talk to their families. Who are tortured on a regular basis (so much proof leaked during the last years, yet noone does anything about it). Remember the American logic: the Geneva Convention is valid in war, but the war against terrorism is not a war, therefor torture is legal.
Not only human rights organizations, but the United Nations (!) have critizied the US repeatedly (!) for the prison. They said that “not even in China” prisoners were denied access to a lawyer.
There were quite a few court decisions against the prison, like this one in 2008:
The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered its third consecutive rebuff to the Bush administration’s handling of the detainees at Guantánamo Bay, ruling 5 to 4 that the prisoners there have a constitutional right to go to federal court to challenge their continued detention. [...]
Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said the truncated review procedure provided by a previous law, the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, “falls short of being a constitutionally adequate substitute” because it failed to offer “the fundamental procedural protections of habeas corpus [...] The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times.”
Alas, they were simply ignored by the politics.
Court: “They have the right to …”
Politics: “No thanks, we’d rather not”.
What country is that?!
2002:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2003:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2004:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2005:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2006:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2007:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2008:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2009:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2010:
january – february – march – april – may – june
That is the time many prisoners were incarcerated in Guantanamo Bay are still waiting for something to happen. Something except for torture and daily humiliation.
Home
Photography

June 27th, 2010 at 16:13
I’m not only angry about this, I also don’t understand.
Are they just keeping it open so that the alleged terrorists can’t sue them within the US? Do they really want to put more people in there? What value does this torture camp have that it is worth keeping against national and international criticism? Why isn’t there any more public outcry about this in the oldest democracy of the world? What does Obama tell his daughters when they ask about the legality of torture and Guantanamo Bay?
June 27th, 2010 at 23:27
I recently read another article that made me really angry: A newspaper claimed that there is a prisoner in Israel who has been kept in solitary confinement for many years without access to lawyers, press – without a public trial. This person is only referred to as “Mr. X” since not even the guards know who he is or why he is kept there..
I have no means to check whether this is actually true, but I would not be surprised if it were…
June 27th, 2010 at 23:47
@ Basti:
And it even is economical nonsense (guantanamo costs around $200 million per year) – like the whole education issue. It’s not only stupid on all kinds of levels to not put more money into education, it is also extremely un-economical! Everybody agrees that most correlations in the field can be interpreted in a causal way (e.g. high correlation between % of adolescents graduating and economical situation in the country 5 years later).
ARRRR. Unbelievable. The UN should really do more about this. Every visiting guest should say something about this. The US is the country always talking bad about Iran, China and other countries for human rights infringements…
@ Philipp:
“In other news, the US is doing that for 8 years now with over 150 people.”
June 28th, 2010 at 20:10
@E.
Yep, it’s just baffling. Years ago I would have blamed a conspiracy, today I’m pretty sure it’s sheer incompetence.
You and I should go into politics ;-)
June 28th, 2010 at 20:15
I suggest:
“The party of the 2 men with the iron masks”.
July 4th, 2010 at 04:04
Guantanamo is the living proof that the rule of war is in a steep decline in the western world since at least 10 years. It is not only baffling to me, it is actually shocking to see this happen and feel one cant do anything against it, not even against the silent support in our own government.
July 5th, 2010 at 19:06
I meant the “rule of law”. Damn you, Freud.