Home
PhotographyAn American newspaper tracked back the dubious US practics regarding prisoners of the Afghanistan and the Iraq war, and found several military bases within Eastern Europe where people are imprisoned without having any rights, where they probably get tortured (there is no proof, yet, I will update this as soon as there is. And there will be.)
2002:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2003:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2004:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november – december;
2005:
january – february – march – april – may – june – july – august – september – october – november;
That is the time most people in Guantanamo Bay are waiting for something to happen. To get an official accusation, thus allowing them to go to court. To talk to a lawyer. Talk to their families. Talk to somebody. 4 years. That different kinds of torture are used is obvious, and not even the president of the US tries to hide that (he said that the convention of Genf is valid in wars, that war against terrorism is not a war, though).
We are used to this for four years now, and still, it is such an outragious behaviour of the US government.
And just because it fits my mood, a ranking of countries using the death penalty:
China, Iran, Vietnam, USA.
November 4th, 2005 at 15:37
Was für eine Leber ist dir denn auf die Laus geplumpst???
November 5th, 2005 at 21:45
Ummm, just felt like writing this entry. Probably reflects to some degree my opinion :-D
November 18th, 2005 at 00:42
PAUL C. CAMPOS: Bush’s defense of torture
By SCRIPPS HOWARD NEWS SERVICE
(SH) – I know a man who tortures his dog. He ties the dog to a board, tilts the board downward, smothers the dog’s face with a cloth, and then soaks the cloth with water. The terrified creature feels as if it is drowning, but because its lungs remain higher than its mouth, it doesn’t. This man told me he did this to his dog seventeen times last month.
In fact, I don’t actually know such a man, but I do know men who approve of such acts, as long as the victims are human beings rather than dogs. This is the official position of the Bush administration on the interrogation technique known as “water-boarding.” According to the Pentagon, water-boarding has been employed “regularly” as a “control measure” at the Guantanamo Bay internment camp. One prisoner was subjected to water-boarding seventeen times in the course of a month.
The Pentagon report also reveals that this prisoner was kept awake for 18-20 hours for 48 out of 54 consecutive days, that he was forced to wear bras and thongs on his head, that he was prevented from praying, that he was forced to crawl around on a dog lead and perform dog tricks, that he was told his mother and sister were whores, and that he was subjected to extensive body cavity searches despite having spent 160 days in solitary confinement.
All of these interrogation techniques have been approved by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Administration lawyers take the position that none of this is “inhumane,” that none of it constitutes “torture,” and that therefore it is all legal under the Geneva Conventions. Their position logically requires the conclusion that it would be lawful to subject American prisoners of war to the same treatment.
Sen. John McCain disagrees and has sponsored a bill that would ban such practices. As a POW, McCain was tortured by his North Vietnamese captors, so his opinion on the matter carries more weight than that of, say, Vice President Cheney, who carefully avoided military service by procuring four draft deferments during the Vietnam War (he has since explained that he had “other priorities”), and who is now the administration’s most enthusiastic proponent of torture.
McCain’s bill passed the Senate by a 90-9 vote, but President Bush is threatening to make it the first piece of legislation he has ever vetoed. “Anything we do is within the law,” the president explained last week. “We do not torture.” (Orwell: “Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable.”)
The Wall Street Journal agrees and describes water-boarding as “merely a psychological technique designed to break a detainee.” In an astounding editorial, one of the nation’s leading newspapers claims that banning torture – excuse me, a “psychological technique” – would “telegraph to every terrorist in the world that he has absolutely nothing to fear from silence should he fall into U.S. hands.”
It takes a special brand of idiocy to argue that people who are eager to blow themselves up in the pursuit of a delusional martyrdom are going to be deterred by the official position of the American government regarding the interrogation of prisoners. The Journal also argues that banning torture may lead to a “mass-casualty attack.” This is a phony concern, because interrogators who genuinely believe they are in such a desperate situation aren’t going to pay attention to the rules anyway.
What legalizing torture really does is to ensure it becomes routine. (The government has already admitted that at least five prisoners have been tortured to death.) Bush’s defense of torture comes down to a single argument: that atrocious acts are permissible in the pursuit of sufficiently important ends. Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden would agree.
Paul Campos is a law professor at the University of Colorado and can be reached at Paul.Campos@Colorado.edu.
November 18th, 2005 at 00:47
Und wieder hab ich die Quellenangabe vergessen: Der Artikel ist vom 15. November, http://dwb.newsobserver.com/24hour/opinions/story/2903786p-11566278c.html
May 2nd, 2009 at 18:00
[...] werden dabei gefoltert (siehe auch: [...]